OFFICE OF POLICE.
- HOW CREATED
The office of police is not known to the common law. It is created
by statute and, as a statutory office, has attached to it only such
powers and duties as are specifically given by statute. In Massachusetts
comparatively few new powers are given, the more important ones
existing through annexation to the office of the common-law powers
and duties of constables. (Dillon Munic. Corp., s. 10; Com. v. Dugan,
12 Met. 233; Com. v. Hastings, 9 Met. 259.) These latter, however,
are so important as to merit some comment in any book of rules intended
for the guidance of a police department.
CONSTABLES UNDER
COMMON LAW. - THEIR POWERS AND DUTIES
In the common law, a constable is called a "peace" officer
or "conservator of the peace." By "peace" as
thus used, is meant the tranquility enjoyed by the citizens of a
community where good order reigns among its members. It is the natural
right of persons in political society, any intentional violation
of which is a breach of the peace. (Davis v. Burgess, 54 Mich. 514;
State v. White, 18 R. I. 473; Beach v. Hancock, 27 N. H. 233; Bishop's
New Crim. Law I, s. 533; Cooley on Torts, Second Edition, 186.)
"Besides actual breaches of the peace, any thing which tends
to provoke or excite others to break it is an offence of the same
denomination." (IV. Bl. Com. 150.) In short as Blackstone concisely
puts it, "Peace is the very end and foundation of civilized
society." (I Bl. Com., 349.)
In this capacity of conservator of
the public peace the dignity and the responsibility of the office
of police chiefly lies.
Speaking generally, the peace of a
community is preserved through fear in the minds of those tempted
to violate it that they will be caught and punished, and the strength
of this restraining influence is, of course, proportionate to the
certainty of arrest and punishment. Consequently, almost every state
of civilized society has found it necessary to maintain officers
charged with the duty of discovering and arresting offenders and
enforcing the laws. It is said that in ancient Rome the public safety
was entrusted to a select body of seventy-five hundred men, whose
functions corresponded practically with those of the policemen of
London. (Dillon's Munic. Corp., s. 3a.) In the civilization which
produced the common law, this public duty was imposed locally upon
officers called constables, selected for the purpose from the inhabitants
of the parishes or townships which they served. These officers were
armed with very large powers of quelling threatened or incipient
breaches of the peace, arresting without warrants, imprisoning,
breaking open houses and the like. One of their principal duties
was to keep watch and ward, similar in main purpose to the day and
night patrol of a police department; "ward, guard or custodian"
being chiefly Intended for the day to apprehend rioters and robbers
on the highway, while "watch" was applicable to the night
only. The constable could appoint watchmen at his discretion who
were his deputies and, for the time being, exercised his authority.
It is not necessary, however, to detail here all the powers and
duties of the common-law constable, since each member of the department,
as a statutory donee of most of them, must be presumed to be generally
familiar with them.
CONSTABLE, LOCAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF PEACE OF THE REALM
It is worth noting, however, that the constable was the local representative
of the peace of the realm - the King's peace, as it was then called
- and was responsible for it; and that it was deemed so important
that his office should always be filled, that service in it was
compulsory and neglect to serve, or to serve satisfactorily, punishable.
The constable could not divest himself of his office at will, for
reasons which have been stated as follows:
"As civil officers are appointed
for the purpose of exercising the functions of carrying on the operation
of government and maintaining public order, a political organization
would seem to be impotent which should allow the depositories of
this power to throw off their responsibilities at their own pleasure.
This, certainly, is not the doctrine of the common law. In England,
a person elected to a municipal office was obliged to accept it
and perform its duties, and he subjected himself to a penalty by
refusal. An office was regarded as a burden which the appointee
was bound in the interests of the community and of good government
to bear. From this it followed, of course, that after the office
was conferred and assumed, it could not be laid down without the
consent of the appointing power. This was required in order that
the public interest might suffer no inconvenience for the want of
public servants to execute the laws." (U. S. v. Edwards, 103
U. S. 471.)
CONSTABLE-REQUISITES
AS TO CHARACTER AND RESIDENCE
The constable had to be of good character and an actual resident
of the parish he served. The office was a personal, not a pecuniary
one. No salary was attached to it. His personal presence in the
parish was indispensable, for he was presumed to be known to all
the inhabitants of the parish, and they were all bound to obey his
orders and to aid and assist him whenever called upon, in the exercise
of his lawful authority. In short, he was a public officer, well
known in the community, and exercising an indispensable governmental
function. The importance of the office did not arise wholly, however,
from the broad powers attached to it, but largely from the close
contact which the constable had with the life of the people among
whom he dwelt. Strangers could not long remain in the community
without his knowledge, nor little could go on without coming to
his ears. This combination of official authority with intimate knowledge
of the character and habits of the members of the community was
well adapted, in earlier times, to preserve a wholesome respect
for law and order, and to foster the belief that violators of the
peace would be marked and punished.
SYSTEM OF COMMON-LAW
CONSTABLES PROVED INADEQUATE
As cities grew up and crimes increased, however, defects developed
in the method of policing by constables. Without adequate compensation,
the constables could not afford to devote "the time required
by the changed conditions to properly safeguard the peace. Then
again, if there were several constables in a community, each was
an independent officer, and there was no system compelling them
to co-operate with each other. In short, while the common-law constables
possessed practically the same powers as those of the modern police,
they ceased to be adequate instruments for preserving the peace,
when conditions of society became more complex, because of the lack
of that singleness of purpose, co-operation and discipline which
are fundamental features of every good police department of modern
times. The results which followed are graphically stated in Macaulay's
"History of England," volume I, page 282, under the title,
"Police of London about the end of the Seventeenth Century,"
and as to still later periods by Justin McCarthy in his "Reign
of Queen Anne," volume I, page 203, and by Dr. Colquhoun in
his "Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis," London,
1795. Nevertheless, these defects in the police system of England
remained practically unremedied until 1829, when an act was passed
by Parliament providing for a trained corps of policemen (still
called "constables" in the act) for the metropolis of
London, with a systematic day and night patrol. This act also provided
for a criminal investigation department, with headquarters at Scotland
Yard; hence the name of the London detective bureau. (See McCarthy's
"Reign of Queen Anne"; Nelson's Encyclopedia, title "Police.")
ESTABLISHMENT IN
MASSACHUSETTS OF A SUITABLE NIGHT WATCH AND A WARD
The offices of constable and of the watch and ward were transplanted
in Massachusetts with the common law, but with the growth of Boston
into a city, the method of policing by the common-law constables
apparently became inadequate for the same reasons as in England.
By chapter 10 of the Province Laws, passed in 1699, it was provided
that in cases where no military watch was established, justices
of the peace, acting with the selectmen of a town, or, in case no
justice of the peace dwelt in the town, the selectmen alone, could
order a suitable watch nightly within such town from nine o'clock
in the evening until sunrise the next day and the place or places
where the same should be kept, and also a "ward" on the
Lord's day and other days, and appoint the members of such watch
and ward.
CONSTABLES IN CHARGE
OF THE WATCH - THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES
The constables of the town were enjoined to be in charge of the
watch, to see that all disturbances and disorders in the night were
prevented or suppressed; to examine all persons walking abroad in
the night after ten o'clock of their business and whither they were
going, and, in case such persons gave no reasonable satisfaction,
then to secure them until the next morning and to carry them before
one of the nearest justices of the peace for examination.
THE WATCH AND WARD
-THEIR DUTIES AND MAINTENANCE
The act also required that the watchmen should walk the rounds in
and about the inhabited parts of the town to prevent any danger
by fire, and to see that good order was kept. All male persons in
the town of the age of sixteen years or upward, being able-bodied
and having certain property qualifications, were made liable to
keep watch and ward, with certain exceptions. The services of these
members of the watch and ward were compulsory, and no provision
was made for their compensation. It was provided, however, that
if the appointing authority should judge that the watch might be
kept more for the benefit and safety of the town in some other manner
than as authorized by the act, and the inhabitants of a town agreed
to support the charge thereof, the justices of the court of general
sessions should determine how the cost should be apportioned and
levied upon the inhabitants. This latter provision allowed the maintenance
of a paid force of watchmen, if any town deemed it necessary.
FIRST FORMAL MOVE
FOR PATROL OF STREETS
By chapter 4 of the Province Laws, passed in 1712. it was provided
that when a watch was appointed in any other manner than that of
the "constable watch" authorized by the act of 1699, the
"number and qualifications" of persons whereof such watch
should consist should be agreed upon by the town, as their pay was
to be agreed upon under the earlier act; that one "sober, discreet,
able-bodied householder" should be appointed to take charge
and command of the watchmen and see that they did their duty; that
such commanding officer should carry as a badge of his office a
"quarter pike with spire on the top thereof"; and that
every watchman should carry a "staff with a bill fastened thereon";
and that the watch should "walk in and about" the streets,
lanes and wharves of the town at night, the first formal move toward
a patrol of streets. The foregoing legislation was the first step
in the establishment of a system of watchmen, paid, qualified, fixed
in numbers and officered.
HEADS OF DIVISIONS
OF THE WATCH APPOINTED
By chapter 5 of the Province Laws of 1761 - 62, the selectmen of
Boston were authorized to choose not exceeding thirty of the inhabitants
to serve as watchmen, the town "agreeing to pay the charge"
and to appoint one of each division of the watch to be head or constable
of that division. This act, which was originally to continue for
three years, was revived from time to time until November 1, 1785,
when it finally expired. Chapter 82 of the Acts of 1796-97 re-enacted
substantially the provisions of the laws of 1699-1712 into a general
law applying to all towns, and provided especially that the expenses
incurred in the maintenance of the watch should be levied and collected
as other expenses of the town. This act of 1796-97 was substantially
preserved as late as chapter 31 of the Revised Laws of 1902, relative
to appointment of watch and ward.
HEAD CONSTABLE
OF THE WATCH APPOINTED
By chapter 26 of the Acts of 1801, the selectmen of Boston were
authorized to appoint such a number of watchmen as they deemed expedient,
to be paid by the town, together with a head constable to superintend
the watch, and a constable for each division of the watch, the constables
of divisions to report every morning to the head constable "an
account of their doings and of the state of the town during the
night" for the information of the selectmen. The head constable
and watchmen appointed under this act were to have the same powers
and be held to perform the same duties as were required of watchmen
under the general law of 1796-97. From this time until the enactment
of the city charter in 1822, the public officers entrusted with
the preservation of the public peace consisted of constables supplemented
by watchmen with the powers of constables, whose services might
be paid for if the town agreed.
ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE POLICE
Under the city charter of 1822, the administration of the "police"
was transferred from the selectmen to the mayor and aldermen of
the city. The word "police" is used in this charter apparently
for the first time in legislation on the subject as descriptive
of constables, watchmen and other officers performing the duties
of conservators of the peace. The word seems to have been applied
first in England about thirty-five years before to that power of
the state which occupies itself in preventing mischief. (See Bentham,
Introduction to Morals and Legislation, vol. XVI, 17, note 2, 1789.)
At the time of the charter of 1822 the word included officers appointed
under the authority of the general act of 1796-97 and of the special
act of 1801. By chapter 123 of the Acts of 1838, the mayor and aldermen
were authorized to appoint such "police officers" for
the city I as they might judge necessary, with all or any of the
powers of the constables of said city.
It was not until chapter 354 of the
Acts of 1853, however, that the creation of an organization approaching
the present conception of a police department was authorized. By
this act, the city council was authorized to unite by ordinance
the watch and police departments of the city, and to establish regulations
therefore.
The council might also authorize a
chief of police, who should exercise all the powers and duties which,
by the laws then in force, were exercised by the head constable
of the watch; and deputy chiefs, captains and lieutenants, who should
exercise all the powers and duties then exercised by the constables
of the several divisions of the watch. The act further provided
that the officers and policemen appointed should have and exercise
all the powers and duties then exercised either by the watch or
by the police of the city, by virtue of existing laws and particularly
by virtue of the provisions of chapter 172 of the Revised Statutes,
relative to the establishment of the watch and ward.
It was further provided that the mayor
and aldermen should have all the powers and duties in relation to
the officers and policemen which they had over the watchmen and
the police of the city.
The appointment and control of police officers of the department
continued vested in the mayor and aldermen until 1878, when a board
of police commissioners, three in number, appointed by the mayor
was created.
In 1885 the administration of the department
was transferred to a board of three appointed by the governor.
In 1906 the administration of the department
was transferred to a single police commissioner appointed by the
governor.
COMMON-LAW OFFICE OF CONSTABLE GRADUALLY ADAPTED
TO CHANGED CONDITIONS
It is interesting to trace these steps by which the common-law office
of constable was gradually adapted to the changing conditions of
society and population until it became the present office of police,
filled by men specially qualified and trained for it, required to
devote their whole time to it, and cooperating to a common end under
the direction of a single head, appointed by the governor for this
sole purpose; and to note that the transition was accomplished by
assimilating the office of constable into the office of police,
rather than by creating a wholly new office with specifically enumerated
duties and powers. To have done otherwise would have fallen short
of the purpose. The office of the common-law constable comprised
duties as well as powers, the duties of conservator of the peace.
These duties, rather than the powers, gave the office its importance.
The powers were incidental, in order to enable the constable to
better perform his duties. If, in early times when the constable
received no salary, his office had consisted merely of the powers
given it by the common law, without any obligation to exercise those
powers, the constable would never have been called the guardian
or conservator of the peace. The incentive to exercise vigilance
and activity would have been wholly lacking. It was the imperative
obligation to take care that the peace was preserved that made the
constable an active and important agent of government. Likewise,
a police officer, though paid to patrol the streets, would be of
little value to society if his office did not also carry with it,
as its very essence, the same obligation. Consequently, throughout
the successive steps in legislation which led to the institution
of the office of police, the duties, as well as the powers, of constables
have been transferred from one form of office to the other, so that,
while formerly it was the imperative duty of the common-law constable
to preserve the "King's peace," it is no less today the
imperative duty of the police officer to preserve the "peace
of the commonwealth."
POLICE INDISPENSABLE
IN THE MAINTENANCE OF GOOD GOVERNMENT
Without magnifying the importance of the office of police, it may
still be asserted that its real dignity" and the indispensable
part it plays in the maintenance of good government arc probably
not yet fully appreciated either by the public at large or, perhaps,
even by the officers themselves. It should be otherwise if, as has
been said, peace and good order are essentially the end and foundation
of civilized society. As to the public at large, it may be said
that the preservation of peace and good order has been such an habitual
state of being in this commonwealth that it is perhaps but natural
that it should be accepted as a matter of course, without reflection
upon its cause and meaning.
It is only in some rare emergency, when the protecting forces of
society are crippled or paralyzed, that the importance of preserving
the peace and the means by which it is accomplished are forced upon
public attention. On such fortunately rare occasions, the lawless
elements, ever present in a community, are released from restraint.
Assaults, robbery, riot, and destruction of property almost inevitably
follow. Business is suspended, stores arc closed or barricaded and
even where the individual himself does not suffer personal violence,
he and his family hesitate to venture far on the streets in the
daytime, and at night are filled with apprehensions. When, under
such circumstances, the thoughtful citizen looks out from his home
at dark upon the deserted streets, reports fresh in his mind of
violence going on in other parts of the city and of an influx of
criminals seeking to profit by the disorder, then, for the first
time probably, he is aroused to the reflection that when; he is
thus thrown upon his own resources" for the protection of himself
and his family, civilized government has ceased; and then, probably
for the first time, he realizes the significance of the presence
and uniform of the police and the indispensable part they play in
the maintenance of government. As to the police themselves, it is
believed that an awakening to the high dignity of their office has
already set in. Certainly, their surest path to public respect and
reward lies in the direction of this ideal of high and important
public service. In order that, they may be guided in this path and
the practical performance of their duties is the main purpose of
the rules and regulations promulgated for the government of the
department.